Is The 1:1 Aspect Ratio Best For Street Photography?

1:1 Aspect Ratio

What is the 1:1 aspect ratio? To understand that, let's first define what aspect ratio is: it is the ratio of the width to the height of an image. A 1:1 aspect ratio means that the height and width of the image are the same, resulting in a square shape.

Most cameras use rectangular-shaped sensors that can shoot in various aspect ratios depending on the intended purpose. Video typically requires a different aspect ratio than still images. Some cameras even allow for capturing still images in multiple aspect ratios.

The cameras I use most often, the Leica Q2 Monochrom and the Nikon Z9, both have the same aspect ratio of 24 x 36 mm, or 3:2. This rectangular shape is ideal for photographing in both landscape and portrait orientations and is visually pleasing to the human eye. Interestingly, this aspect ratio is similar to that of televisions, theatres, computer screens, and most printed materials. Given that many designs are optimized for this ratio, one might wonder: why create images in a 1:1 aspect ratio?

Why make images 1:1?

The challenge lies in growing without being limited by my own constraints. In this sense, using a square aspect ratio is ideal for street photography. If it inspires you to surpass your current self, then it is undoubtedly the best choice. Working with a square or 1:1 ratio requires a distinct approach to composition and subject selection. Although it may take extra effort and consideration, exploring this square format can be incredibly rewarding for photographers. It reveals new creative opportunities and expands the scope of their artistry.

I started my street photography journey in the 1990s, and Rolleiflex was the holy grail camera for me. I was fortunate to have some nice Canon and Nikon 35mm cameras and lenses to use. I cut my teeth on the 3:2 aspect ratio. The medium and large format cameras alluded me for many years. Unfortunately, the Rolleiflex was never meant to be. I can shoot 1:1 with the Nikon; it blacks out the rest of the frame. The Leica Monochrom requires post-production cropping. I shoot the same way in both cases, exercising previsualization to fill my frame.

What fills the 1:1 frame?

The tried and true advice of getting closer will serve the 1:1 frame well. Fill up that frame. There is less real estate; do not waste a single inch of it. This also means there is less frame for the viewer. Make it easier for them to see what you want them to see.

The opposite can also be true. Given that there is little area for negative space, it can have a more significant impact on the 1:1 frame. The images below all show negative space but could not have been improved by getting closer. The space and the relationship between it and the subject make the image. The 1:1 frame intensifies this relationship.

Is it the best?

Is it truly the best? It can be, especially if it pushes you to grow. When you master it and wield it with your creative vision, it becomes a powerful tool. Take some time to consider testing or using the 1:1 format. It is not for everyone, but everyone should try it.